COUNTRY BRIEFING
FROM THE ECONOMIST INTELLIGENCE UNIT
A still-unresolved political crisis in Bolivia has served as a reminder that
the day-to-day operations of South America’s natural-gas users depend to a large
extent on the continent’s weakest economy and democracy. In Brazil, more than
one-half of the natural gas consumed is imported from Bolivia. The political,
and increasingly class-defined, calamity that has ousted two presidents in La
Paz in 20 months threatens to interrupt the flow of natural gas to Brazil, and
is forcing its government, and industries, to formulate contingency plans.
A modicum of calm has recently returned to La Paz, but the peace is uneasy
and is probably only temporary. A heady protest movement remains bent on
nationalising Bolivia’s hydrocarbons fields as well as multinational oil and
natural-gas companies’ assets.
The Bolivia-Brazil natural-gas pipeline extends more than 3,000 km between
Río Grande in central Bolivia to São Paulo state and then Porto Alegre farther
south. Several natural-gas fields operated by Repsol YPF (Spain) and BP (UK)
were invaded in mid-June by protesters targeting multinational oil and
natural-gas operations.
Brazil’s state-owned hydrocarbons conglomerate, Petrobrás, which controls the
pipeline and owns refineries in Cochabamba and Santa Cruz, imports US$600m worth
of natural gas from Bolivia a year--a figure equivalent to 7% of Bolivia’s GDP.
Although Petrobrás was not hit directly by the social unrest, on June 8th
Brazilian officials reported a notable reduction in the daily supply of Bolivian
natural gas.
Plan B
Before business could return to normal, and before Bolivia’s new caretaker
president, Eduardo Rodríguez, agreed to early elections, Brazilian officials
were drawing up contingency plans. The Mines and Energy Ministry advised
industrial consumers of natural gas to switch to oil or diesel fuel wherever
possible.
A natural-gas shortage poses the most acute danger in São Paulo and Brazil’s
south, where some 2,000 companies use it to fuel their day-to-day operations.
São Paulo state’s energy secretary, Mauro Arce, has warned that
natural-gas-fuelled power stations would be the first to suffer in the event of
a cut in supply, followed by automotive vehicles, mainly taxis in urban centres.
Residential consumers of electricity and natural gas would be the least likely
to be affected. However, as Coca-Cola (US) was preparing one of its plants in
Belo Horizonte to switch from natural gas to bottled gas (GLP), the company
announced that the costs involved would force it to increase prices.
In the end, the government’s contingency plan did not have to be implemented.
Yet the Bolivian situation is a serious alert and a serious setback for
natural-gas distributors, which have invested heavily in recent months to boost
the fuel’s domestic usage. The crisis promises higher prices for industrial
natural-gas consumers and greater risk for investors operating across a wide
swath of South-east Brazil, at least in the short term.
Weaning itself of Bolivia
South America’s overall longer-term energy prospects are brighter. Petrobrás
is due to start pumping natural gas from recently discovered deep-sea reserves
in the Santos basin by 2008, which will help reduce the company’s dependence on
Bolivian imports. Consequently, substantial investment is urgently needed in
transport infrastructure, mainly pipelines.
In addition, the governments of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Peru and Uruguay
have pledged to strip the red tape from a US$2.5bn pipeline project aimed at
reducing the regionwide risk of future energy crises. The so-called gas ring
will transport some 30-35m cubic m/day of natural gas from Peru’s Camisea fields
to Chile via a 1,600-km pipeline connecting Pisco with the Chilean seaport of
Tocopilla. Most of the Peruvian natural gas is expected to flow on to Argentina,
Uruguay and Brazil through upgraded existing pipelines and the construction of a
US$300m conduit between Uruguaiana in southern Brazil on the Argentinian border
and Pôrto Alegre, Brazil.
Officials believe they can expedite the political, legal and technical
processes associated with the project so as to have it operational in 2007.
France’s Suez group, already working on a technical solution for the
Pisco-Tocopilla pipeline through its Tractebel subsidiary, will be part of the
consortium of multinational energy companies formed to execute the project. If
the plan materialises in its entirety, Brazil could benefit by importing an
additional 5m cu m/d of natural gas from sources other than Bolivia.
On a more political front, the governments of Argentina, Brazil and Venezuela
have pledged to boost co-operation among their state-owned oil and natural-gas
companies in the name of integration and, in the words of Venezuela’s leader,
Hugo Chávez, regional solidarity.
SOURCE: ViewsWire Latin America